Volume 6, Issue 1, March 2020, Page: 36-51
Assessment of Body Composition in Physical Education Female Students of University of Niš
Ružena Popović, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Aleksandra Aleksić-Veljković, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Tijana Purenović-Ivanović, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Aleksandra Popović, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
Received: Jan. 16, 2020;       Accepted: Feb. 12, 2020;       Published: Feb. 21, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ash.20200601.15      View  497      Downloads  152
Abstract
This paper is based on the results of the cross-sectional experiment that was implemented in the school year 2015/2016, within the female students of the third year of undergraduate studies at the Faculty of Sport and Physical Education (FSPE), University of Nis. The study was for the first time realized in this school year, during the mandatory curriculum in Rhythmic gymnastics (6th semester of education, weekly classes 3+3, and 45+45, per semester). Assessment of body composition is realized along with the Pedagogical practice (as pre-exam study requirements). The sample includes 30 PE female students, within the 3rd year of study following the Bologna Declaration. Based on the body composition assessment, the student’s results are displayed in the form of histograms, for each measured variable. Comparative analysis of results was used for the consideration of the differences among examined students within the group, considering the calculated Mean values and recorded MIN and MAX results, as well as student profile model score. The results were evaluated based on the system for the assessment of body composition (OMRON BF511) and the interpretation of results for the following variables: body fat percentage, visceral fat, percentage of body muscles, body mass index (MBI), and the basal metabolic rate. The results obtained show the expected intra-group differences in body composition parameters, which are not inherited conditionally, for all of the selected body variables (except BMI). But, although the most of the values are recommended, those low percentages of high body fat (BF), and body mass index (BMI), as well as relative skeletal muscle mass values (M%), indicate the heterogeneity of the student population, their sports orientation, and their level of physical activity.
Keywords
Body Composition, FSPE Female Students, Parallel Analysis, Case Study
To cite this article
Ružena Popović, Aleksandra Aleksić-Veljković, Tijana Purenović-Ivanović, Aleksandra Popović, Assessment of Body Composition in Physical Education Female Students of University of Niš, Advances in Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2020, pp. 36-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20200601.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Bale, P. (1978). The physiques of physical education students and their relationships to performance. Research Papers in Physical Education, 3 (4), 30-33.
[2]
Bale, P. (1979). The relationship between physique and basic motor performance in a group of female physical education students. Research Papers in Physical Education, 1, 26-32.
[3]
Bale, P. (1980). The relationship of physique and body composition to strength in a group of physical education students. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 14 (4), 193-198.
[4]
Bolonchuk, W. W., Hall, C. B., Lukaski, H. C. & Siders, W. A. (1989). Relationship between body composition and the components of somatotype. American Journal of Human Biology, 1, 239-248.
[5]
Cvetković, M., Obradović, J., Kalajdžić, J. (2008). Effects of Pilates on morphological characteristics of female students of the Faculty of Physical Education. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije, 43, 605-613.
[6]
Jachson, A. S., Pollock, M. L. (1985). Practical assessment of body composition. Physician and Sports Medicine, 5, 76-90.
[7]
Jović, D., Đurašković, R., Pantelić, S., Čokorilo, N. (2010). Constitutional differences in student from Faculty of Sports and Physical Education. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije, 45, 335-342.
[8]
Komiya, S., Masuda, T., Ube, M. & Mitsuzono, R. (1996). Body size and composition in different somatotypes of Japanese college-aged women. Applied Human Science, 15 (1), 5-11.
[9]
Krick, C., Raschka, C. (2012). Sports anthropological comparison between male martial arts fighters and the students majoring in physical education. Papers on Anthropology, 21, 155-162.
[10]
Krsmanović, B., Jakonić, D., Krsmanović, R., Krsmanović, C. (1997). The somatotype of the Faculty of Physical Culture students. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Jugoslavije, 33 (pp. 177-183).
[11]
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A Step-by-Step Guide to SPSS for Sport and Exercise Studies, edited by Chicago, IL, USA.
[12]
Omron (2002). BF511, Body Composition Monitor. Instruction Manual (pp. 16-17). http://filehost.fonq.nl/Gebruikshandleidingen/Omron/HBF511.
[13]
Popović, R. (2015). Analysis of the entrance-exam objectivity criteria for the physical education study applicants selection: an overview for the period last up 1970th to 1990th. In J. Suchy (Ed.), CZECH KINANTHROPOLOGY, 19 (1), (pp. 46-60). Text book, ISSN 1211-9261.
[14]
Purenović-Ivanović, T., Popović, R., Đorđević, M., Živković, D. (2013). Body type and composition of the PE students. In S. Pantelić (Ed.), Book of Proceedings of the XVI Scientific Conference, FIS COMMUNICATIONS 2013“ in physical education, sport and recreation. (pp. 397-404). October, 18–19, 2013, Niš: Faculty of Sport and PE, Serbia. UDC 611.018, ISBN: 978-86-87249-53-0.
[15]
Simić, S., Vasić, G., Jakonić, D. (2010). Body height, body mass and nutrition status of students of the University of Novi Sad. Medicina danas, 9 (4-6), 141-146.
[16]
Srdić, B., Dmitrić, G. & Obradović, B. (2009). Anthropological characteristics of students of Faculty of Sports and Physical Education. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije, 44, 463-470.
[17]
Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Human Biology, A guide to Field methods. International Biological Program. Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
[18]
World Health Organization (1995). Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO.
[19]
WMA (2002). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/06d0331/06D-0331-EC20-Attach-1.pdf.
[20]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, pp. 83-391.
Browse journals by subject